Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0353320140380020058
Oral Biology Research
2014 Volume.38 No. 2 p.58 ~ p.62
Histomorphometric analysis of implant-bone interface between SLA¢ç and Joy 1 implant¢ç in dogs
Jung Min-Gu

Zheng Ming-Zhen
Lee Won-Pyo
Park Do-Young
Yu Sang-Joun
Kim Byung-Ock
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare the osseointegration of SLA¢ç to these of Joy 1 implant¢ç.

Materials and Methods: In 6 beagle dogs, 3rd and 4th mandibular premolar were extracted bilaterally. After 3 months, four transmucosal screw-shaped implants were placed in each mandibular edentulous premolar region. Control groups were SLA¢ç and experimental groups were Joy 1 implant¢ç. The implants were allowed to heal for 4 or 8 weeks. At the end of the experiment, the dogs were sacrificed and each of implant sites was dissected and processed for histomorphometric analysis.

Results: Histomorphometric analysis showed direct osseous integration for both implants. No significant difference between both types of implants could be detected after 4 and 8 weeks healing periods in bone to implant contact (BIC) and bone ingrowth (BI).

Conclusion: The results indicate that there was no difference in osseointegration between SLA¢ç implant and Joy 1 implant¢ç regarding BIC and BI, Joy 1 implant¢ç showed similar histological response with SLA¢ç implant. Dental implants, Osseointegration.
KEYWORD
Dental implants, Osseointegration
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)